Saturday, September 27, 2008

Another result of accepting Shar'ia Law


Hat tip to Dhimmi Watch

For over 2 weeks now Shar'ia Law has been incorporated into the British legal system. This was done to appease their Muslim minority. The government officials stated that this would not impact on the average Brit. Yet just looking at this report now, we can see the effect of caving into the wishes of the minority, and the impact on the majority.

Muslims try to get alcohol banned at Tesco

Bedford Today, UK September 25 2008
By Sally-Anne Johnson

Petitions handed in as licence hearing looms

More than 150 people have signed petitions imploring Luton Borough Council to deny the new Tesco Express in Bury Park an alcohol licence.

The bid from the supermarket giant has upset Muslims living in the area, some of whom say they find the idea of alcohol being sold offensive.

Next Tuesday councillors will make a decision on the application, which, if successful, would see the store permitted to sell alcohol from 6am until 11pm every day (...)
And what would happen if they did this all over Great Britain? How long will it be until the Muslim minority will close the pubs? Demand women to wear the hajib? Force the full Dhimmitude on the majority? How long would it be until the average Brit would take to the streets and riot?

This is why we in the United States must resist all attempts to incorporate Shar'ia Law into any aspect of our legal system. This is why each and every time groups like CAIR try to force employers and communities into giving special treatment to Muslims, we must oppose it forcefully and with all our means possible.

We must remind our Representatives that:

Shar'ia Law isn't compatible with the US Constitution!

6 comments:

Maggie Thornton said...

RCP

When the ArchBishop of Canterbury suggested this, I thought Brown said "no way, ever." Sigh!

I read that Tancredo has introduced legislation against this in the U.S.?

Faultline USA said...

Excellent article. In October of last year I wrote "Why America Must Define Religion," which is a perfect fit with your article. Americans must demand a constitutional amendment to once and for all define what constitutes a religion. See link:
http://faultlineusa.blogspot.com/2007/10/why-america-must-define-religion.html

KG said...

When--oh when will people begin to realise that any concession to muslims is the thin end of the wedge?
There's no such thing as "reasonable accommodation" with this ideology.

Rebel Radius said...

Creeping Shariah has arrived whilst
Freedom has left the building.

Robocop said...

This is another reason this Presidential Election is so important. Not only must our lawmakers be immune to Muslim influences, but so must our courts,which the next President will shape.

Julia Riber Pitt said...

Actually, all religion mixed with government isn't able to go alongside the Constitution. Come on! The Constitution says we have freedom of speech, but the Ten Commandments say we aren't allowed to say certain things, like lie or use the god thing's name in vain. What's up with that??? Whether the USA was founded on Christian ideals is beside the point. Only 75% of this country is Christian and only a certain percent of those people actually practice their beliefs (my dad considers himself Methodist but he has only been to church a handful of times since he graduated high school). You can't legislate people's beliefs!

Conservatives are hypocrites.