Showing posts with label Vancouver. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Vancouver. Show all posts

Monday, June 2, 2008

Vancouver: The Fight For Freedom

This is an ongoing series of reports from Covenant Zone in Vancouver.


I think we've got you on our hand-out for tomorrow morning at the local court house where we will be staging a small and low-key demonstration in support of free speech in Canada and the world at large. We've had a great reaction so far. Tomorrow at 8:00 we'll see who shows up to support us, and we'll see if the man on the street cares at all about this issue as of yet. In time we'll succeed but for now we're still not so well known.

My colleagues at Covenant Zone and I have put together two double-sided pages to hand out tomorrow. I have done a couple of my won that we won't hand out, this being Canada where people are professionally timid. The people are my friends and colleagues, so I make allowance, particularly given that I am a guest in this country. However, the Internet is not Canada, and the following links are from my blog, representing me alone.

Let us do nothing while there is time.

The soul selects her own society.

There are links to covenant zone at the bottom of each piece here. I'll try to write up a short intro for your blog, if I may post it there through you. This is a very foreign nation, stranger all the more so for being on the surface so much like America. It i not at all America. Here, the thought of free speech is not automatic, and the creature who claims the "free speech in an American concept" is right. my colleagues here are not strong believers in aggressive freedom. Thus, seeing them protesting in favor of Mark Steyn is remarkable to the nth degree. I hope this gives you and your readers some comfort, as it does me.

I'd like to be in touch with your blog more often that I have been, and if this trial winds down quickly I'll make an attempt to respond to comments direct to me there more promptly than I have so far. I apologize to your readers for that. I still have to make a living, poor excuse that that is but it's the one that has me.

---

Yalla,

Dag

You can find a copy of the leaflet that Covenant Zone has created here. Monkey in the Middle supports Free Speech every where in the world. Even in Canada. Our good neighbor to the North.

Covenant Zone meets every Every Thursday evening, 7-9 p.m, at the main public library in the atrium outside Blenz coffee bar they meet to discuss current events regarding jihad and Left dhimmi fascism.

If you are in the Vancouver area, you are welcome to join them.

Monday, May 26, 2008

Vancouver: The Heroic Struggle

This is an ongoing series of reports from Covenant Zone in Vancouver.


Primo Levi was an Italian intellectual, a man who had a Ph. D. in chemistry, held down a good job, and lived a quiet life as a Jewish guy in a small European city, everything pretty ordinary and sort of nice. Then one day he landed at Auschwitz. Eventually he committed suicide.

I'm happy to write that there's more to this story. It's not a happy story, but it's a story worth knowing, I think. In the abstract, it's our story today. I'll keep it very brief.

Levi survived the death camp. He did so by surviving. I mean, and he explains, he survived because he wanted to survive, and he thought about it, and he discovered there were ways of surviving, ways others didn't think through, those others dying in their millions. We know it's millions. We know Levi survived because he wrote Survival at Auschwitz. We know from his book that he survived, ultimately, by chance. And if we try to think he survived because God spared him to write this book, then I suggest that God could have found any number of better writers, probably far better people, to do a better job. Levi isn't a great thinker, not a great writer, not a great person. Any of a million other people could have written the kind of book he wrote. That's why it's important: because he's ordinary. He's only exceptional in that he survived Auschwitz. In his book he summarizes the experience in a essay entitled "The Drowned and the Saved." I put it to you, dear reader, that we face the same situation Levi faced, though not so brutally and immediately, but the same dilemma of life: Do we live or do we die? I don't mean to liken the world to a death camp; I hope to bring to our attention the problem we face, that Levi faced, in whether we will live rather than die. Levi faced an immediate problem by the moment. We face something different but we face a problem of being in the same sense Levi did. What kind of people are we? Are we the Drowned or are we the Saved?

Levi relates that he witessed people disembarking from trains, that they were lined up, sorted out, some sent to die immediately, the rest sorted out for death by, among other means quicker, exhaustion and starvation. We, of course, don't face that kind of immediate physical threat, but I suggest we face threat as dire in the long term, the existential threat of dying like those disembarking from trains at a death camp. Levi claims he didn't want to know those around him, didn't give them names, didn't think of them as alive at all. it wasn't cruelty or apathy or hatred. Those who disembarked from the trains, those not singled out for immediate murder en masse, we given labor specifically engineered to cause their deaths within three weeks if they followed the rules assigned them. Most, the vast majority, and almost to a man, followed the rules. They followed rules designed to murder them. He saw those around him as not alive to begin with, their deaths not being anything more than a formality. They were, he writes, the drowned.

Levi committed suicide, as did many survivors of the death camps, and as do many survivors of other horrors. He died, though, after he survived Auschwitz. Was it worth it? Having an answer to that will tell what kind of person one is.

It is the natural fate of most of Humanity to follow even unto death that which they follow regardless. Who knows? people are social and they do as others do, even if that is to die by murder. In circumstances less dramatic than Levi's one has the luxury of sympathy. I find that I have written for a number of years now the same phrase: "We are blessed." We are blessed with the chance to care about those who have no idea of their peril. We re blessed in that we can take our lives and do some great thing in the defense of the defenseless, those disembarking from the trains of societies unraveling before our very eyes daily. All are lost in this life, and none survive. Till then, that time, is it worth the living?

Those who never ask such a question are those who deserve never to have to ask such a question; but they might be faced with such a forceful thing. It is our blessing that we will be ahead of all in our defense of the unquestioning. I'm sorry to say it's nothing dramatic we can do. no costumes like a comic book hero, no fancy space weapons to blast down enemies by the score. We can do this great task set for us by simply sitting quietly, talking. If we're saved.

Again I've made a long preamble to a short point. Here in Vancouver, Canada we, my mates and I, sit in the main hall of the city library once a week, talking and drinking coffee and swapping books and so on, like any of hundreds of others around us. We are very unexceptional. Some might say, some indeed have said, we are boring. We seek such people. We have, actually, found many. To a degree, they are in trouble that affects their lives deeply. You might know of some of them by name. Mark Steyn is one. Ezra Levant is another. Kathy Shaidle, too. No one is pointing a gun at their heads, not directing them to death chambers. This is, after all, Canada. Here, the situation is different, less violent than many other places, but as creepy and worsening as one might find anywhere that fascism has seeped into the fabric of society. It will only get worse if people drown in the rule-following of conformity and sociable behaviour. It's the nature of things.

Last evening, Thursday, we met as we do every Thursday evening, to discuss events in the nation and beyond regarding jihad and Left dhimmi fascism. We focussed our discussion on Steyn, Levant, et al. No costume changes, no ray-guns, we simply sit and talk and plan as we can to assist our colleagues in the struggle to stop the Leftist fascism now so deeply rooted in the West. What can we, as bloggers and private citizens, do?

There is no shortage of issues, here or elsewhere, to do with jihad and Left dhimmi fascism. So, along with our discussion of Styne and company, we discussed as well the local situation that includes people in the immediate area, those under attack in various devious ways, by the socialist political party that runs a good half of the city. We have contacted and befriended a number of those who are struggling to wrest control of a community center from professional "social activists." As it happens, the latter group have strong liking in their public announcements for the use of Stalinist cliches and Maoist phraseology. It's not surprising, given that one of their numbers showed up on television at his election to the city council wearing a Che Guevara tee-shirt. Not surprising that one of the clique referred to the area as a "Maoist Liberation Zone." We sit at the library and talk. We aren't particularly dramatic. We talk about free speech, how to protect people who exercise it, those who are penalized for doing so. And sometimes they just go too far and we go picket the bastards and make ourselves real visible and heard over their shouting! There come times when enough is enough and one must stand up and start making it known it's too much at all.

We might even lose this struggle not just for the right to speak freely in public but to live at all. We might find ourselves attacked by ever-more emboldened jihadis. We've had our minor encounters. There might well come a time when we can't face them down without a fight. We're talkers and writers and thinkers. We aren't brawlers. But we're not going to drown, either. If there's any way to prevent it, we won't let our societies drown in the muck of collectivist fascism. We might go down with the rest, but we'll go down trying to swim. Yes, it's hopeless, and we'll all go down someday, never to return and lost for eternity. But not till then. Till that time we go on and we sit like the best of men who talk. We drink coffee and we even eat cookies. That's what I ask of you, dear reader. What kind of person are you?

If anyone were more heroic than we, I'd get nervous. What would we have in that case? We don't need hot-headed people looking for instant and eternal answers to all of life's problems. We seek instead comrades in an endless struggle to preserve what good we have and to extend it beyond it's current boundaries and to others who might or might not develop it further. But we live scattered across the wide globe and we might never meet face to face, hand in hand. We might have to rely on knowing that you and yours sit quietly in libraries talking to those who feel like you, that freedom is worth preserving and extending in your neighbourhood against those who would extinguish it from our nation and these lands. it doesn't take much to further the freedoms our forefathers died for. We do our parts just by sitting in public letting the world know we are there. And they do know. For all the lack of drama, we frighten the Death hippies in this city. Because people whisper about us now, whereas before they stayed silent and did what they were told, obeying the rules that allowed the creation of this nasty little police state in Canada. All it take is sitting down to talk. I hope that you will, in your town or your city, do the same for the sake of all.

I'll return next week if I may to bring some news of Mark Styne who will face the government in a hearing against him for having written a book, America Alone. As well, i hope to have news of a local nature on the Maoist liberation Zone's community centre election of a board of directors, some of whom were last term evicted from the building for daring to question the ruling cliques right to do as they pleased, which is to run a campaign headquarters on union wages to re-elect a Communist M.P. from this city. this story will never end, and shouldn't end. it's the nature of life that we will always have to work to preserve and extend the good. And because we can, friend, I say, "We are blessed."

--

Yalla,

Dag

Covenant Zone meets every Every Thursday evening, 7-900 p.m, at the main public library in the atrium outside Blenz coffee bar they meet to discuss current events regarding jihad and Left dhimmi fascism.

If you are in the Vancouver area, you are welcome to join them.

Friday, May 23, 2008

Vancouver: Fighting the Thought Police

This is an ongoing series of reports from Covenant Zone in Vancouver.


Freedom of speech is an American concept, so I don't give it any value. ---Dean Stacy, Canadian Human Rights Commission

It's Thursday in Vancouver, Canada, and that can only mean one thing: The Blue Revolution comes again to the public library to meet openly and as subversively as possible in the atrium outside Blenz coffee bar. We don't do this to upset the thought police in the country, but as soon as they clear their roster for trials against Mark Styne, Erzra Levant, Kathy Shaidle and co, I suspect they'll find a way to bring us up on charges too. We meet once a week here in Vancouver to talk about, among other things, free speech, which as you see above, is an American thing. What you might not have known is that according to the CHRC, that means it's not a Canadian thing. And who or what is the CHRC? Damned if I know.

They're the thought police here, but what is that? What, aside from a group of quasi-judicial provincial and federal government employees with the power to enter your home or office at any time they find reasonable to look for anything they might find of interest to themselves regarding a complaint anyone at all might have made about you being a hate-monger, and then having the power to haul you before their commission to have a hearing, which, by the way, you need a lawyer to defend you from, (while the complaintant has his paid for by the government) and which, unfortunately for you, you have no chance of winning since the government bureaucrats have never lost even one case, i.e they've won 100 percent of their cases against "hate-mongers', you can then get socked with an entirely government backed-up by the police fine of up to $50,000.00. That's part of what the thought police CHRC is. And it gets worse, unfortunately. Worse and worse and worse daily. If you haven't see so far, look at the youtube videos of Ezra Levant for some black humor and more details of this madness. Dean Steacy, as above, he's a government bureaucrat who files charges against hate-mongers. He's one of the thought-police here. I'm not making it up. Crazy, yes, but it's true. And eventually the CHRC thought police are going to come for me and the people I meet with every Thursday evening at the library. When they do we do not stand a chance of defending ourselves against them. No one does.Not ever.

"[F}or an organization that is supposed to promote 'human rights,' the HRC's agents seem curiously oblivious to basic aspects of constitutional law. In one famous exchange during the Lemire case, Steacy was asked 'What value do you give freedom of speech when you investigate?" -- to which he replied "Freedom of speech is an American concept, so I don't give it any value.' "


I'm living in a foreign country, and this one is so foreign I can't shake my head hard enough to see straight when I encounter the kind of insanity that passes for law and government here. This is Canada, only a few hundred miles from Seattle, only a short drive to America. This place is mad with politically correct thought police run amok. It's a porous border, friend. If you come here, you can be arrested for saying the wrong thing, and you can end up bankrupt for it, criminalized, and ruined. This mad place is coming to you, however slowly, and not so slowly at that.

My friends and I meet in public once a week in the main library to talk about jihad and left dhimmi fascism. We sit in the open, and anyone who cares to know does know that we do so. We face down jihadis, we confront Death hippies who can barely restrain themselves from attacking us physically. We stand up to them, and we sit every week for a couple of hours to show we won't be silenced by this kind of government sanctioned madness. They'll come for us someday. till then, we sit and challenge them to come today. This might be the day. We won't know till they come for us. I'm asking you to sit with us. I'm asking you to face the same danger. To take the same risk of losing and being hurt.

Free speech is an American thing. I don't expect anyone from out of town to actually sit with us this day, but I do ask that you think about sitting in your own city library with your own friends as we do here to discuss the case of free speech in Canada. We're going to talk again this evening about Mark Styne, who'll be here in a few weeks to face his own inquisition before the CHRC's provincial arm, the B.C. Human Rights Tribunal. you can do that now if you choose to. You can sit with people you meet over the internet or from your daily encounters with people you know. You can do what we do, and with some lesser degree of danger, I hope. Free speech. It's an American Concept. According to many Canadians, it's a Canadian concept too. Even the English have thought it an English concept since around the time of the Magna Carta. The French, much as one might not think them likable, think of it as a French concept, at least since 1789. And many people around the world think it's just plain universal as a concept. But it's one people have to fight for if it's going to be a concept all at.

We're going for coffee and cookie tonight at the library. We could be arrested for talking to each other. We could be arrested for talking about free speech.
We're not exactly wild-eyed radicals here. We're more bookish and tending toward the past 40 demographic. We're dangerous. We speak out loud in public and people know about it. We aren't political or religiously motivated. We're just folks who believe in democracy and other American things like free speech. We're creating a revolution here. We'd like you to join us in it. Meet some friends for coffee at a library. Talk. Share ideas and books and internet tips. You'll scare the hell out of the Death Hippies if you do.

Tonight we'll talk about Mark Styne; about the the al-Dura hoax, about a 15 year old English boy arrested for referring to Scientology as a cult; about retirees threatened by the city government for speech violations; maybe about homeless people barred from city shelters for being suspected of blogging.

Mostly we'll sit and have coffee and talk and wait....


--
Yalla, Dag

Covenant Zone meets every
Every Thursday evening, 7-900 p.m, at the main public library in the atrium outside Blenz coffee bar they meet to discuss current events regarding jihad and Left dhimmi fascism.

If you are in the Vancouver area, you are welcome to join them.

Tuesday, May 20, 2008

Vancouver: News From the War on Jihad III

This is the last part of Dag's posting for this week.

The Covenant Completed

There are in the West two kinds of people who attend to the nature of publicity: there are those pre-9/11 and there are those post-9/11. It's been like that from the beginning of the Enlightenment circa 1750. It began clear on Sept. 12, 2001. We are either pre-Enlightnement people or no; either reactionaries or progressives; either collectivists or individualists; either neo-feudalists or Modernists. We are, in short, either counter-revolutionaries or revolutionary Americanists. These are dichotomies made to raise voices and tempers. Nevertheless, they are essential and real. We stand defined in our metaphysic and episteme certainly by the reaction we have to the attacks of 9/11. Who we are is how we feel about or, conversely, how we think of 9/11.

There are numerous diagnostics one can perform quickly to find out what kind of person one is Descartes or von Herder? "I Think, therefore I am," is a person entirely different from one who claims "I feel, therefore I am." One is Classical or Romantic. And on it goes. The one current and most common dichotomy is 'Left and Right.' There can hardly be a less meaningful distinction in our time. Rather, there is the reactionary and the progressive, to be brief. How we react to the Triune Revolution, that defines us essentially.

I began this essay with the intention of promoting the concept of you, dear reader, forming a Covenant Zone of your own. I've tried to lay out some background of that begun in Vancouver, Canada, of it's trials and travails and tribulations. My hope is that one will not rush out into the world expecting, as I did, great mass movements on the spot. Most of our won are not such people,and the few who will move toward greater freedom and who will work for it incrementally over the decades won't be moved by rhetoric or parades. I do hope that even with my low-key presentation of our successes you might be encouraged anyway to attempt to reach out to others like yourselves. If you do, you will reach out to a small and select group of thinkers. To act in forming your Covenant Zone would be to act in a state of faith, in yourself, and particularly in your fellows and in our nation and the greater world. I have been blessed in this.

Until such time as we who are post-9/11 become the dominant proportion of our intelligentsia we will be faced with a hostile public, those who face whichever direction according to popular opinion as defined by the intelligentsia. It is not particularly easy for most to stand against the crowd. To do so for years on end with no end in sight requires faith in the good. Hatred won't do it. Revenge is not enough. One needs faith in our future, one we might never live to see. Faith is neither stupid nor sentimental, irrational nor passionate. One might say our faith and our Covenant can be very boring. Depending on the kind of person one is, that in itself is a draw. Our efforts, though not immediately successful and not dramatic, are paying off slowly in positive ways, and I have, from this adventure, no scars to show for it. We who meet weekly in our public library are not universally loved or admired or even liked or tolerated by the public. We face hostility from jihadis at times, and weekly we face possibilities of violence. We carry on quite nicely in spite of it, and we gain, however slowly, a foot-hold in society. We reach on occasion a post- 9/11 person. And it really has little to do with 9/11 at all. It is in the mind and in the person's understanding of the meaning of life. Those who have faith, who have love and concern and true belief in our great nation, (even if in this case a foreign nation,) fight for the rights of Humanity. We recommit ourselves weekly in our covenant.

There is no dogma here, no grand creed, no oaths of loyalty to sign in blood. We come as individuals to meet individuals, and in that we struggle against the collectivists of the counter-revolution. Yes, we were attacked on 9/11, but the struggle had been raging fiercely for hundreds of years before that. Now it is open. You might find it to your advantage to participate in a meeting of your own at your own public library to meet such people as yourselves. I can't predict your success. Mine has been life-changing. Yours might not be so, but it might, though, match mine. One will know by acting in good faith. The covenant is within yourself, and you can share that with others, should you and they care to make that leap of faith.

I'll close here and next time I'll do as I was invited to do in the initial exchange, which is to give some precis of our meeting. We talked last day of Mark Styne, of Ezra Levant, of Kathy Shaidle, and the struggle against the thought police in Canada who bring charges against journalists and bloggers to a quasi-judicial court with coercive powers. When I return on Thursday I'll leave some sense of what we speak of and why we do so. Meanwhile, I hope I've given some sense of the act of the Covenant. The rest is, dare I write this-- kind of fun. We organize and attend demonstrations against the Death Hippies. I'll have more on that next time.

--

Yalla, Dag



I eagerly await your next report Dag. Each time we confront Jihadists and their rhetoric, we win a bit of our freedoms back. To keep the West safe for the next generation we must have "Constant Vigilance"!

Monday, May 19, 2008

Vancouver: News From the War on Jihad II


This is Part 2 of the Vancouver Covenant Zone report.

The Covenant Continued

On Sept 11, 2001 our social relations with our nation and the world at large altered at the foundation. I suggest that at that time our contract and covenant with the world came up for renew. Few have addressed this. Most have, rather, ignored it completely, carrying on as if before. Above I gave a synopsis of a possible middle-class life outside the norm. I offered it as one model of our collective future as citizens of an altered world. The meaning of citizenship and duty are not the same that day and will not be so again. We continue to pretend only at our collective peril. What was normal and decent on Sept. 10th is not since Sept. 11 any good at all. To live within a pre-9/11 world-view is delusional. Worse, it is fatal to our nation and to the larger world.

I have few ties to home and family and therefore am free to pursue the nature of things according to my immediate vision. That's not the standard by which most Westerners live. Fair enough and rightly so. However, this is not a time any longer in which normal is normal. Ours is a time of serious conflict at the foundations of our social world. My presentation offers some highly radical propositions, and I'm taking a long time to set the scene so the reader might have some context in which to place these propositions in a clear light. This world of ours is not the same one it was a few short years ago, and we do ourselves a disservice if we don't subject our assumptions to scrutiny in this new order. Radical is sense. I have few ties to hold me to the status quo, and I realize most others cannot simply abandon it without a fair explanation of why anything other is better.

Our Modernity is divided today into two parts, one unconsciously accepting a world-view of pre-1789, 1776, 1750: half of our own fellows live in a world of the pre-Enlightenment and pre-Industrial Revolution. We are, dear reader, in a civil war. The attacks of 9/11 made that clear. We are divided into those who live in a reactionary world-view, i.e. a Gnostic neo-feudalism, on one side; and those who live on the other in a state of progressive Modernity. Our future depends on which side of this struggle is triumphant; and that very much depends on who knows what the stake is and why we do as we do. Why we bother, if we do at all. There is a clear division between those who feel the world of reaction is at war with the world of progress. The former feel that the war we are currently engaged in a civilizational conflict in the making, is nothing more than a bumper-sticker slogan. On the other side there are those who understand that the world of Man s bifurcating daily into two worlds of irreconcilable hatred and eventual total-war. I've written extensively on this subject elsewhere, so here I'll briefly state that of the total of our populations there will only be 15 percent who engage in active duty for or against our civilization. The remaining 85 percent of people will act at best in various supportive ways without active engagement. Our divided world is not then, one of man against man and everywhere Nature red in tooth and claw. the state of things is far simpler. Perhaps seven percent of our populations are for, and eight percent against. Our civil war, fought amongst the intelligentsia, is about that two percent who must shift for the weak side to dominate. In our Modernity, the shift might well need be far more that two. It can be done. We who prize freedom and our democratic Modernity, those of us who intend to univeralize it, can succeed. We must though understand the nature of our condition. And we must act within our laws.

The draw that brings me here is the question of Israel attacked by our own nation. the question to ask ourselves is at what point is our nation no longer ours but that of others, of usurpers? At what point do we see our nation ruled by our enemies? At what point are our laws and our government illegitimate and we rightly at war against our own nation? What is the foundation of our notion, and is it changed now so fundamentally that we are no longer citizens but subjects? I argue that the time is not now. We still have the basic America of our Constitution intact. But for how much longer will we see a government by Fifth Column as legitimate? And then, dear reader, what is to be done? Today that question is simple. The answer is simple. We as free people with a right to vote for our representatives do vote, and in our congress of advocates we decide our mutual benefits and compromises. Today it works. Today we are lawful citizens abiding our legitimate laws.

Since 9/11 things are totally changed in the very soul of our nation and our world. The world today is divided between those who struggle for freedom and Modernity and those who act for the restoration of the Middle Ages. The divide is widening daily. Most people stand in the middle of this struggle, falling into an abyss of which they know nothing, taking as their world-view what they gather from their community of fellows, those around them who say what others say. Predominant today is the narrative of the so-called Left. At worst, they represent a small proportion of the American public, some percentage of the 15 percent of those who are the intelligentsia. You, dear reader, are in that 15 percent, at a good guess. You are, by all odds, a normal person living a normal life in our collective Modernity. Unfortunately, Modernity itself is not what it was, and cannot be again. It will be -- or can be-- something else; and what that something is will be up to you. I offer the suggestion that you are at war. Your life is not the same thing it was, and you cannot legitimately expect it to be what it was after the war came home on 9/11. I am clearly not suggesting that we break our laws and wage a private war against enemies our nation won't war against. We have a military and a paramilitary, and it is our role in government and in our nation to govern ourselves in civil matters. That is where I suggest we wage a full war against our enemies. There will be no filibuster of Modernists campaigning across the world as in days of old. Instead we might find a new model army, as it were, of citizens armed with ideas doing battle against the primitives of our own nation and the world.

Two and a half years ago I met a few people who came to a meeting I called for over the Internet. Frankly, I had expected hundreds. Two showed up. No, not two hundred. Two people. I was one. The following week another came. I would like to write that in that time we have grown into the thousands and are soon expecting hundreds of thousands to join us in our struggle to redeem our nations. I'm not a novelist. Most weekly Thursday evening meetings we hold in public at the city library in the open spaces of the atrium are just us three. There are sometimes more, sometimes guests come from around the world to speak to us, IDF agents, soldiers, scientists, lawyers, philosophers, travelers, and thinkers of all sorts. They come to our Covenant Zone.

It's the nature of things that most people will never become involved in public affairs other than football games and parades on the Fourth of July-- as spectators. The fundamental shift in the ground of the existence of our nation didn't move many. some of us, more interested in the public than in the party system of politics, reach out to those who would care to affect the restoration of our nation to a solid ground of democracy. This is not a partisan affair of parties, it is a desire to recommit to a covenant of nationhood and public duty as citizens regardless of party and creed. Not religious, ours is an act of faith in democracy and the people who live in our Modernity. We talk a lot. I had no idea when I began this struggle that I would talk so much. Mine was a desire for action and arms against the jihadis. My call to arms brought out two men who think. I found myself listening.

I'm making this long presentation so you will have an idea of what can be done and what one might expect if one cares to attempt to meet ones fellows for the sake of saving our nation from destruction. Whereas I thought my ideas radical in the beginning, I see now just how radical instead are the ideas of my fellows here in Canada. My world shifted out of orbit on 9/11, and I thought my call to arms was a radical response. I find it was not so at all. Militant, yes, but not radical. That came from my colleagues later.

Next day I'll try to conclude with the idea of our Covenant Zone, of why we sit week after week talking and thinking aloud. I hope to show that from such comes a path to renewal of our great nation and our Modernity. I hope to show why we have faith in the future of our America, or,in this case, Canada.

I'm looking forward to the last part of this report and will post reports from Dag, our intrepid reporter in Vancouver hopefully each week.

Sunday, May 18, 2008

Vancouver: News From the War on Jihad I

Our intrepid reader Dag and his group each Thursday evening, 7-900 p.m, at the main public library in the atrium outside Blenz coffee bar to discuss current events regarding jihad and Left dhimmi fascism. If you are in the Vancouver area, you are welcome to join them. This is the first of what I'm hoping will be many reports of their activities.

************************

The Covenant

When we were attacked on 9/11 our world was changed fundamentally forever. To this day there is a confusion and a fear that many cannot grapple with and master. In this comment and the one to come next day I'll try to explain how I came to view this struggle against the eternal jihad and how I found myself, thanks to those who came to meet me, as part of a new covenant with my nation, with Humanity, and Beyond. This is a narrative of discovery I had no idea could take place in this life. I suggest such discovery can come to anyone. As I found out, gradually and with much resistance, this comes from faith.

Each Thursday evening for two and a half years I have met with like-minded people to discuss our reaction to 9/11 and to discuss our plans to counter it. Before I delve into the details of a meeting such as that of last evening, I would like to give a bit of background to make sense of what comes later, i.e. the creation of a Covenant Zone. If you can bear with me, I hope you too will wish to go forth at some time and create such a covenant yourself.

****

Within days of 9/11 I found my visit to Canada unbearable. So, after a sojourn in the Middle East that had lasted a couple of years longer than I had originally planned, I aborted my visit and boarded the first available flight to Central America to flee the tension of the pervasive anti-Americanism in the country and wandered in the highland jungles and fetid swamps of a different kind of sick place. Buried in the aftermath of a death culture, the lands of lost civilizations and buried cities, of draining heat and death squads and vividly colored mud huts and exotic birds and lethal snakes of all sorts, a calming time, after a year of it I ventured home to see family unvisited for 10 or 15 years, to touch base and rekindle old relationships. However, such was not to be, and the road called again. Finally I ended up at a university teaching part time, till I was exposed as -- a conservative. There and then I knew that 9/11 was going to stay with me for all of my life and it would never go away, no matter where I went or what I did. I was a full-blown 9/11 man for the duration. The road had ended. There a new life began for me. I became a blogger. I became a 9/11 blogger, a blogger returned to America in the mind if not in the flesh. America became my life again, and my experience, and reification of it became the ethereal. I became an Internet American.

In those early days of traveling through the aether I explored ways and by-ways far and away stranger than anything I'd seen in Africa or Asia or the North or the South, the plains, the seas, the quiet, the dank and terrible. I ventured into the world of jihad and what in time I came to term as Left dhimmi fascism, violent, evil places of the darkest minds in our shared world, places I'd experienced in the real world in person over the many years I've been moving aimlessly through these various ways of the Human experience. The mind and the heart of Darkness became my constant abode. Motivated by hatred and the thirst for revenge, I sought out my enemies and raced from place to place looking for details and cracks to peer into for more that in time I might strike back with all the impact my fury demanded. As I searched for my enemies and those to target for revenge I found others on the same dispatch. Lights in the utter darkness of jihad and evil, I made friends in the aether. It was not enough. People are either real or they are not, and for all the good-will I have toward those who write, those who hunt as I hunt, I needed more from them, I needed, in short, them, people in the flesh to look over and judge and to be judged by. Thus I ended up sitting for a couple of years in a place my fellows here and I called the Fortress, a small business that allowed me time to gather up my tools to struggle for a genuine victory over those who attacked us and who would, who will, as I know too well, never stop till they are stopped. So I worked at the struggle as I knew best how. I wrote.

The jihad attacks us from all sides, from here and there, from outside and inside. I have pictures in the mind to put to the words they speak and the words they write; and I knew them deeply even then, better by far now. I know too that they will never cease the struggle to dominate, the wild Will of Islam pulsing through the life of every jihadi till he is laid down forever. And our nations, ruled by law and Reason, here we do not struggle in obscene and unremitting battles without recourse to mercy and pity. Our enemies do. Thus, I wrote, (to those who would read,) to move away from our collective civilizations to the farthest boundaries of our lands to meet and plot our victories to come. I wrote of us meeting in far away cities to plot. "Go to Sophia," I wrote, "and I'll meet you there." I felt sure thousands would arrive by every means, perhaps even on foot, to join the struggle that is now our life. "Americans, let us meet in Mexico City to plan the destruction of our enemies, us out of range of our governments. Where there is no American law, we will not break American law. I will meet you there beyond the law." I was full of confidence that ours would surge to the call to filibuster, to wage war on our eternal enemies. Such, of course, and such obviously, didn't and perhaps couldn't happen. Men of means do not rush off to distant mountain cities and cold urban poverty to plot outlawry and right justice. Men stay home and go to work every day, returning home to families and mortgages. The mercenary life of the middle aged man is not that of the average man at all. I didn't know, knowing few who live so settled that an attack on our nation could pass by unconsidered. My mistake. I'd lived a life sheltered from these harsh realities, the normal life of man hidden from me by jungles and deserts, endless plains, cities in ruin, and murder. I'd been away too long. I was a stranger in the world of my own people. There was no writhing mass of men raging to break free of settled home to wreck the world of our enemies. My mistake.

But I continued to write and to beg for men to join our fight, to struggle for victory and revenge and, dare I say it, to fight for glory. I haven't yet found such people. That time will come. It is not yet. Instead, I have something different, and something only the Guiding Hand could lead to.

After such a long preamble, I come to the point here that two and a half years ago, people heeded my call to meet me and to plan. I'll elaborate on this next day.

--
Yalla, Dag

You can find Dag at no dhimmitude. And if you have a group that meets on a regular basis, I will post it's meetings here. The more we network, the more we gather to plan, to fight, the stronger we become. Our enemy thinks we are weak because we are scattered. That has to change and the time of change is now before it becomes illegal in the West to meet and talk.


Dag,
I hope that you don't mind that I used your photo Dag, and you really do look like Jean-Paul Marat.