No Baptists Allowed

Hat Tip to Israel Matzav

I find it ironic that the Moonbat Left screams on how tolerant the Palestinian Authority is towards Christians.  How under the PA Christianity is allowed to be practiced.  Just look at the plight of the Christian community in Bethlehem.   Just look at the flourishing of these communities.  So what the PA is doing to the Baptists in Bethlehem should come as a shock to the left.

A week after Prime Minister Salam Fayyad told an audience of Evangelical Protestants from across the world that his government respected the rights of its Christian minorities, officials from the Palestinian Authority have informed Bethlehem pastor Rev. Naim Khoury that his church lacked the authority to function as a religious institution under the PA.

The church can still gather to pray, for now, but the PA’s decision conveyed on Saturday will have a real impact on the members of First Baptist, which endured numerous bomb attacks during the First Intifada.

“They said that our legitimacy as a church from a governmental point of view is not approved,” said Khoury’s son, Steven, who serves as an assistant pastor at First Baptist. “They said they will not recognize any legal paper work from our church. That includes birth certificates, wedding certificates and death certificates. Children are not even considered to be legitimate if they don’t have recognized paperwork.”

The irony, Steven said, is that the PA’s announcement comes right after the Christ at the Checkpoint Conference. This conference, which took place from March 5 through March 9, 2012 was a gathering of approximately 600 Evangelical Protestants from across the globe (mostly from the United States) to discuss the theology of Christian Zionism, which some Evangelicals believe increases the prospect of violence in the Middle East and gives support to Israeli policies that they do not like.

During the opening night of the conference, Palestinian Prime Minister Fayyad told the assembly that his government respected the rights of Christians. Palestinians celebrate religious holidays together, PA officials attend Christmas celebrations and even attend Midnight Mass for Christmas, Fayyad said.

“This is what it means to be a Palestinian,” Fayyad said, adding that the PA feels a deep sense of responsibility for the holy places and will allow unfettered access to places of spiritual significance in areas under its control.

Nevertheless, there is a sense among Christians in Bethlehem that anti-Christian animus has gotten worse in the city over the past few years, Khoury said. “People are always telling them, ‘Convert to Islam. Convert to Islam. It’s the true and right religion.’”

This is the second time the church has been told it is operating without PA sanction, Khoury said. Other churches in Bethlehem are left alone, said Khoury, who suggested that the church’s love for both the Jewish and Arab people and its belief that both can live in the land in peace may have played a role in the PA’s decision. Prior to the PA, the church, which was founded in 1980, never had a problem with its paperwork, Khoury said.

“We believe it’s people who don’t like what we’re doing and the message we offer,” he said.

The church’s message of reconciliation flies in the face of the propaganda that permeates Palestinian society. Muslim clerics routinely offer up anti-Semitic rants on PA television and so-called peace activists have turned the concrete sections of the security barrier in Bethlehem into a canvas for their propaganda, which in some instances proffers a troubling fatalism to its viewers.

For example one section of the security barrier near the Alrowad refugee camp in Bethlehem depicts two Palestinian youths throwing rocks and another being arrested by Israeli soldiers. Alongside the image, the artist has written in French and English the phrase “We can’t live, So we wait for death.”

Khoury said the Palestinian Authority needs to treat all sects with equality and respect their rights. “The First Baptist Church in Bethlehem has demonstrated its value to the community over the years and proven itself to be a law-abiding church,” Khoury said.

Khoury said he will speak to members of Congress in the United States to draw attention to what is happening to First Baptist in Bethlehem.

“We did let them know that we’re not going to go quietly on this,” Khoury said. “We want our church to be fully recognized equally with all the other recognized denominations. Our church deserves the right to be equally recognized amongst all the other recognized denominations in the PA.”

Joann Magnuson, a long-time observer of Christian communities in the West Bank, said she has known the Khourys for at least 15 years.

“I know them to be serious Christians, busy caring for their flock and preaching the gospel of love and forgiveness,” she said. “It’s seems more than coincidence that the Christ at the Checkpoint conference ended and now the Khourys are being targeted.”

At the time of publication the PLO Mission in Washington, D.C. has not responded to The Algemeiner’s request for comment on these allegations. This story will be updated as information allows.

Source

The first thing Islamist do is to eliminate the Churches.  The PA has plans already written to convert the Church of the Nativity into a Mosque.  They cannot convert the holiest Church in Christendom into a Mosque while allowing this little Baptist Church to exist.

It seems that the Evangelicals who attended the anti-Semitic Christ at the Checkpoint Conference and were told that no restrictions would happen to the Christian Community.

And they believed it too.  I've got a bridge to sell these useful idiots.  It's an antique, but in excellent condition, you have to pay shipping and handling:

Not To Be Trusted By Their Own Government

When the Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta gave a speech to a group of US Marines today in Afghanistan, he ordered that the Marines were to be disarmed before the speech.

Less than a week after a US staff sergeant allegedly massacred 16 civilians in Kandahar, American soldiers were banned from bringing guns into a talk by Mr Panetta at a base in Helmand province.

Around 200 troops who had gathered in a tent at Camp Leatherneck were told "something had come to light" and asked abruptly to file outside and lay down their automatic rifles and 9mm pistols.

"Somebody got itchy, that's all I've got to say. Somebody got itchy – we just adjust," said the sergeant who was told to clear the hall of weapons.

Major General Mark Gurganus later said he gave the order because Afghan troops attending the talk were unarmed and he wanted the policy to be consistent for all.

"You've got one of the most important people in the world in the room," he told the New York Times, insisting that the decision was unrelated to Sunday's killings. "This is not a big deal."

However, US troops often remain armed even when their Afghan colleagues have been asked to lay down their weapons and the incident is believed to be the first time they were stripped of guns during an address by their own secretary of defense.

The Ministry of Defense was unable to confirm reports that a small number of British troops had also been asked to put down their weapons.

Mr Panetta told the troops that the massacre of civilians and the resulting Afghan fury would not affect plans to keep US troops in the country until the end of 2014.

"We will be challenged by our enemies, we will be challenged by ourselves, we will be challenged by the hell of war itself," he said.

Source

Why would the Secretary of Defense be afraid to speech in front of American soldiers who are armed?  What is he afraid of?  And if he is afraid, does the President fear the military too?  And what will be his punishment to the military?

Elizabeth Holtzman Speaks at UC Irvine

Gary Fouse
fousesquawk
http://garyfouse.blogspot.com


On March 13, 2012, former Congresswoman Elizabeth Holtzman gave a presentation at UC Irvine on the idea of impeaching / prosecuting George W. Bush and Dick Cheney.  Since it was right next door, I popped in and amused myself.

Holtzman, a former DA of Kings County (Brooklyn) is hawking a book called "Cheating Justice- How Bush and Cheney Attacked the Rule of Law. Plotted to Avoid Prosecution-and What We Can Do About it". She was introduced by the Dean of Student Services Elisabeth Schroeder, who met Holtzman in college and later worked for her when Holtzman was in the House of Representatives. Schoeder gave a bio on Holtzman and described how she defeated the incumbent representative, Emanuel Cellar, in the 1972 Democratic primaries. Schoeder described Celler as being unconnected with his constituents and their concerns.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emanuel_Celler

Holtzman was a member of the House committee during the Nixon Watergate hearings. I remember watching her on TV. Although I firmly accept that Nixon was guilty of impeachable offenses and deserved to lose his office, I recall vividly that some members of the committee seemed to have made up their minds on Day One. One of them was Elizabeth Holtzman.

Anyway, after expressing her belief that everybody should be accountable under the law no matter what office they hold, Holtzman outlined her theory and reasons why George W. Bush and Dick Cheney should be brought to justice. "They broke the law", she said. "Not secretly, but in public".

Holtzman explained all the "lies" that Bush and Cheney told to the public and to Congress about Iraq in the run-up to the Iraq war . (She never told the audience that virtually every security and intelligence agency with whom we work had told the administration that Iraq had or was developing weapons of mass destruction).

"Why did Bush do this?" she asked? "Was it for oil? For his father? For re-election? We don't know", the former DA concluded. (Oh well, you don't need to prove motive, you know, but I would have said, "to protect the country from any future attacks after 9-11".)

Holtzman gave us laws and statutes that, in her view, had been broken (by Bush and Cheney).

First was a crime to defraud the US (by their "misrepresentation" of the need to attack Iraq). She quoted 18 USC 371.

This is 18 USC 371

http://www.justice.gov/usao/eousa/foia_reading_room/usam/title9/crm00923.htm

Second was Foreign Intelligence Wiretaps violations.

Holtzman did not make the differentiation between ordinary criminal wiretaps that require a normal court order and national security wiretaps. She merely stated that Bush decided he didn't need to obey the law about getting court orders. I'll give her the benefit of the doubt and assume she was including the FISA court.

Third was mistreatment of detainees and violation of anti-torture statutes in accordance with the Geneva Convention and the War Crimes Act (1996).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_Crimes_Act_of_1996

Holtzmann stated that Bush and Cheney took us out of the Geneva Convention. (She later amended that to state in regards to the Taliban and Al Qaida.). She described the involvement of DOJ attorney John Yoo, who wrote a legal opinion that allowed them to get around torture. (Yoo's name was mentioned twice, and both times it brought chuckles from a few audience members.) She mentioned a memo that Bush received from Alberto Gonzalez advising him to get the US out of the Geneva Convention to reduce the "likelihood that we would be prosecuted later"( under the War Crimes Act of 1996).

So, according to Holtzman, it was a prima facie case that Bush and Cheney could be prosecuted, which I guess, is the thesis of her new book.

What was not mentioned in any of this was 9-11.

Solutions?

According to Holtzman, we need to revise the statute of limitations; we need a special prosecutor; and we need to  re-instate the War Crimes Act. In summary,  justice for all, rich and poor, no matter their position with no immunity for those who happen to be top officials.

Well, that sure sounded reasonable to me, so when Q and A came, I raised my hand and asked her why she didn't support impeachment for President Bill Clinton, when he committed perjury while in office. I told her that I seemed to recall her being interviewed about it, and  that she pooh-pooed the idea of impeaching Clinton.

"I still do," she answered then went on to state something to the effect that crime and impeachment were two different things. She began talking about how there was a move to impeach Nixon for tax evasion. At that point, I said that the question was about Clinton.

She didn't like that. Her voice rose; she pointed her finger at me and said, "I am answering it, but I will answer it in my own way".

According to her own way of answering the question, Holtzman seemed to draw a line on perjury because the impeachable office had to be an abuse of office. I guess that meant that perjury by a sitting president is not an abuse of office. So much for accountability.

When I asked for a follow-up, she cut me off with a curt, "No, you've had your question" (or something like that).

My feelings were hurt.

Another questioner asked if President Obama and Attorney General Eric Holder should be impeached for having an American citizen killed in Yemen (Anwar al-Awlaki). Holtzman said that she had not studied that since her study was on Bush and Cheney, that she was troubled by it, but she couldn't answer that.

Another questioner wanted to know if Bush and Cheney could be brought to trial in a foreign court. To that Holtzman remarked that the "US is not playing an enlightened role in this area". She mentioned the example of Pinochet, who was brought to trial 27 years after he was violating human rights in Chile. She mentioned that Poland was investigating the secret prisons in its territory where detainees were taken. She  expressed the hope that actions abroad might wake us up (US).

Another questioner wanted to know if Bush and Cheney could be impeached even after leaving office. To that, Holtzman explained that their pensions could be taken away.

That was pretty much it since the event only lasted an hour. At that point the audience adjourned to another room to buy Holtzman's book. (I did not.)

Here is what I took away from this event. As I had always suspected, Holtzman has a partisan bent when it comes to impeachment. She's all gangbusters when it comes to Republicans, but not when it comes to Democrats. That is based on what I will call my 4 for 4 formula. Impeach Nixon and Bush? Yes. Impeach Clinton? No. Impeach Obama? "I don't know anything about it". Elizabeth Holtzman is quite selective in her outrage in my book.

To Snip Or Not To Snip

Will somebody please tell the idiots leftists in San Francisco that being a circumcised man gives you a 15% lower for Prostate Cancer risk than an uncircumcised man.  Strange that this information did not come from any Israeli University but from Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle.

Circumcised men may have a slightly lower risk of developing prostate cancer than those who still have their foreskin, according to a US study.

The World Health Organization already recommends the controversial procedure based on research showing it lowers heterosexual men's risk of contracting HIV, the virus that causes AIDS.

Last year scientists also reported that wives and girlfriends of circumcised men had lower rates of infection with human papillomavirus or HPV, which in rare cases may lead to cervical and other cancers. And last week, researchers reported that African men who were circumcised were less likely to be infected with a particular herpes virus.

The new study, published in the journal Cancer, jibes with those findings but falls short of actually proving that circumcision will reduce a boy's future cancer risk, said Jonathan Writer, at Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle, who led the study.

"I would not go out and advocate for widespread circumcision to prevent prostate cancer," Wright said. "We see an association, but it doesn't prove causality."

Although most US men are circumcised, the procedure has become less popular over the past decade, and various groups have spoken out against it. In September, the Royal Dutch Medical Association discouraged the practice, calling it a "painful and harmful ritual."

For their study, Wright and his colleagues compared two groups of more than 1,600 men who had answered questions about their medical history, sex life and whether or not they were circumcised. Half had prostate cancer, the others didn't.

In the group with cancer, 69 percent of the men have been circumcised, compared to 72 percent of those without cancer -- suggesting a small protective effect.

Even accounting for a host of other factors, such as age, race and whether or not the men had been screened for prostate cancer, those who were circumcised still had a 15 percent lower risk of the disease.

"Circumcision before first sexual intercourse is associated with a reduction in the relative risk of prostate cancer in the study population," Wright and his colleagues wrote.

The foreskin is prone to tiny tears during sex, which may help bacteria and viruses enter the bloodstream.

Wright said that some viruses can trigger cancer when they are incorporated into human DNA. Another possibility is that sexually transmitted microorganisms could lead to cancer by causing chronic inflammation.

Source

While for the majority of people in the United States circumcision is a matter of preference, for Jews and Muslims circumcision by a certain age is a mandatory obligation under the faith.

I guess G-d knew what he was doing when he demanded Abraham to circumcise himself and his people.  And Science backs this up.

Wednesday's Hero: Maj. Britt Reed

Maj. Britt Reed



Maj. Britt Reed reads a Dr. Seuss book to children during a celebration of Dr. Seuss' birthday at Fort Rucker Primary School March 2.

Photo Courtesy U.S. Army Taken By Angela Williams

These brave men and women sacrifice so much in their lives just so others may get to enjoy freedom. For that I am proud to call them Hero.

Those Who Say That We're In A Time When There Are No Heroes, They Just Don't Know Where To Look.

This post is part of the Wednesday Hero Blogroll. For more information about Wednesday Hero, or if you would like to post it on your site, you can go here.

The Lies Arabs Tell!

Hat tip to IDF Spokesperson

Two photos tweeted in the past 24 hours, both allegedly depicting the results of Israeli air strikes in Gaza in recent days, have been proven false.

How many of us has seen this picture?

1. The photo first tweeted by Khulood Badawi (@KhuloodBadawi) and later by Diana Alzeer (@ManaraRam), allegedly depicting a Palestinian girl killed by an Israeli air strike yesterday, was proven to have originated in 2006 and to have had nothing at all to do with Israeli action. This photo is now the top tweet for #Gaza, with over 300 retweets. It is completely false.

It looks very bad for this little girl.  Those bad Israelis killing children, bombing with abandon.

Badawi first tweeted the picture at noon on March 10, claiming it was linked to last night’s air strikes. Alzeer tweeted it on March 11, claiming the same.

Both were refuted by tweeter Avi Mayer (@avimayer), who found that the photo dated back to 2009 at least.

Further research revealed that the photo was taken in 2006 by Reuters, and that the girl, initially thought to have been killed in an Israeli air strike, was injured by falling off a swing. When confronted with this information, Alzeer stated that the photo was taken last night and forwarded to the press that day.

In fact, the photo was taken by Reuters on August 9, 2006. It was originally released with an incorrect caption, and then corrected a day later:

A Palestinian man carries the body of three year-old Raja Abu Shaban, in Gaza August 9, 2006. The three-year-old girl who had been reported killed by an Israeli air strike in Gaza on Wednesday actually died of an accident, Palestinian medical workers said on Thursday. Workers at Gaza’s Shifa hospital said on August 10, 2006 that the initial mistake over the cause of death appeared to have arisen because the girl’s corpse was brought in at the same time as the bodies of the gunmen. REUTERS/Mohammed Salem (PALESTINIAN TERRITORIES)

Alzeer later published an apology and withdrew her claims. Badawi has yet to respond.

The original tweets, however, have already been picked up by hundreds of others and continue to circulate around the web, despite having been thoroughly disproven.

2. A second photo tweeted Maissam Nablussi (@Nablussi), allegedly showing an aerial strike in Gaza today, was proven to have been in circulation back in 2009, completely unrelated to the current round of violence.

On March 11, Nablussi uploaded a photo to Facebook, claiming it depicted “Gaza under attack today.”

The photo was also tweeted by Gaza Youth Break Out (@GazaYBO), under the same claim.

The photo was revealed to have first appeared on various websites, including that of Reuters, in 2009, following Operation Cast Lead.

After the truth behind the image was revealed, Nablussi blocked access to the Facebook post. She has yet to retract her claim regarding yesterday’s aerial strike. Neither has GazaYBO.

This isn’t the first time people have spread false information about the IDF. Meanwhile, lies are still being tweeted throughout the web.

Share this post to fight misinformation–set the facts straight about what’s going on in Israel and Gaza.


Wondering what else you can do? Spread the truth.

I am a big proponent of recycling but not of old photographs that have been doctored to produce propaganda instead of the truth.

As the Fakistinians keep shelling Israel with rockets (over 300 so far) the IDF has shown great restraint.  Instead of targeting civilian centers, the IDF targets the terrorists themselves as seen in these videos:

Pinpoint Targeting of a Hamas Weapon Manufacturing Facility

Rocket Launch Squad Targeted

Targeting of a Popular Resistance Committee Rocket Launching Site

This site is at El-Atatra

Instead of telling the truth, the Fakistinians and their supporters are lying to garner sympathy.

Help the Israelis under fire.  Tweet this and be free to steal this in its entirety.

You Might Be A Ron Paul Supporter If...

If you painted the name of a presidential candidate on your barn.

If your idea of fun is freezing your ass off waving signs with your friends.

If you think your grandpa would be rolling in his grave if he knew what was going on in America.

If tomorrow feels like Christmas because your package full of Ron Paul stickers and t-shirts is on it's way.

If you really honest to God feel good about what we are doing, win or lose.

If you have real difficulty deciding whether to pay the electric bill or donating to the next money bomb.

If you plastered your car with campaign bumper stickers rather than fixing the rust.

If you spit your coffee out of your nose when Ron Paul holds up a silver dollar to Ben Bernake.

If it looks like a truck full of campaign signs exploded on your lawn.

If your idea of new school clothes for your kids is a Ron Paul hoodie.

If you think there is no difference between Obama, Newt, Mitt, and Rick.

If you find your friends coming to you to ask for signs and bumper stickers.

If you know the difference between a million, a billion or a trillion.

If you and your friends are wondering how many more flyers your printer can possibly take before it explodes.

If you dream about new and exciting places to plaster that new roll of campaign stickers.

If you think Jesus might be really pissed at lots of so called Christians right about now.

If you know the difference between blowback and bull crap.

If you think bombs are better used for campaign donations than for blowing up bridges in other countries while ours fall apart at home.

If the FEC shows you as one of the biggest campaign contributors in your ZIP code, but with lots of small ones over time.

If you think the FED is making sure our dollars will be printed as toilet paper in the near future.

If you give campaign flyers along with the candy on Halloween.

If you know the difference between military spending and defense spending.

If your reading list has lately become filled with names like Rothbard, Rand, Hayek, Mises and Paul.

If you support our troops and want them to come home where we need them on our own borders.

If you aren't afraid to use your real name anymore when you comment on every article you can find on Google every day.

If you have found courage within yourself since you have awakened from your slumber and ignorance.

If you have decided to be a leader rather than a follower from now on.

If you know that no vote is thrown away, and that your vote is your voice, your choice, your line in the sand.

If you know that this is not just an election, that this is a movement for the long term, our evolution, our revolution.

If you have decided to write in your candidate of choice rather than give it to someone else or sit things out as your message to the machine.

A Personal Message From Iron Dome Soldiers

Hat Tip to Israel Matzav

Imagine the United States under rocket attack from Mexico.  And imagine American military men and women operating a missile defense system.  And imagine a few of these soldiers are asked to help film a safety message.  You would get this.

Turn the captions off when you watch this or you will have double subtitling in English

A Personal Message From Iron Dome Soldiers

A Thought For The Day

 For the last 3 days over 300 rockets have been fired into Israel.  Israel has retaliated back across the border.  The Main Stream Media has reported only on Israel's retaliation and not the rockets fire upon Israel.  Yet not one peep of protest by Muslims world-wide.

Perhaps it is the fact that only 24 people (all known terrorists) have been killed.
Perhaps it is the pin point bombing that isn't destroying any homes.

But we are waiting for them.  Such as this one:

Pro-Hamas Demonstration  Fort Lauderdale Dec. 2008

Or this one complete with the bloodied baby doll:


Amsterdam Jan. 2009

And in San Francisco the Gays marched for those who would hang them for being Gay.

San Francisco Jan. 2009

If the Gay Community wonders why I no longer support them, that is why.  The Gay community supports those who kill Gays and Lesbians.  They condemn those who support openly Gay and Lesbians.  Before Gays served openly in the US Military, they were being drafted and served openly in the IDF.

I am awaiting with baited breath for the riots protests to begin.

160 Missiles And Counting

Every day 5 to 10 Missiles are fired from Gaza into Israel.  This daily attack has been on going for over 10 years.  But this last weekend over 160 Missiles have been fired into Israel with 8 wounded.

Now the MSM and the Moonbat left will exclaim:  "But they only hurt 8 and most don't do any damage."  But I ask them:  What would you do if Southern Israel was Southern Texas?  Would you not demand the US government to stop the attacks?  Would you side with those who fire the rockets into civilian areas and only civilian areas?  The MSM and the Moonbat left side with those who fire the rockets and call for the death of the civilians under attack.

The condemning of Israel and Israelis by these groups is nothing less than modern day anti-Semitism.  It is permissible to call for the death of all Jews and not be shunned.  In fact the left will put you on a pedestal instead.'

And yet, the people of Southern Israel have suffered for years under daily attacks from Gaza.

When Israel gave up Gaza in 2005 they were PROMISED that there would be peace.  From that day till now the rockets and missiles have fallen.  Yet Obama is demanding that Israel give up Jerusalem.  How long do you think that rockets and missiles will fall from there?

Pray for the Nation and people of Israel.  Please help the people of Israel.  If you can a few dollars to The American Friends of the Magen David Adom (Israeli Red Star of David) will help all the people in the Southern Israel.  Just click here. 

Guess Who's Coming To Dinner?

No not Sidney Poitier, but President Barack Hussein Obama.  The Royal Visit Presidential Visit will occur sometime in July.

In the latest DEBKAfile issued this last Friday the analysts reveled:

1. Prime Minister Netanyahu has given President Obama breathing-space for a decision on the timing of an attack Iran.

2. As the latest DEBKA-Net-Weekly issue disclosed exclusively this Friday, Obama wants to meet Netanyahu again in July and is considering a trip to Israel to be combined with visits to other Middle East capitals. He reckons the trip will give his reelection campaign a major boost.


It cannot be said now if this journey will take place before or after an attack on Iran and whether it will be an American, an Israeli or a combined operation.

3. Iran is meanwhile forging ahead with the production of highly-enriched uranium with the help of advanced centrifuges and with the assembly of nuclear weapon components - undeterred by sanctions or diplomatic pressure. What could be more rational than taking advantage of “the window for diplomacy” so freely offered?

Then again Obama is having a hard time convincing Jews he is a friend of theirs.  All of the Muslim World has gone on record saying that:

1.  Obama is a Muslim

2.  Obama will hand first Jerusalem back to the Arabs, then all of Israel to them.  By physical force if necessary.

Yet the Jews of the United States are waking up to the reality of Obama.  When Obama addressed AIPAC last week he received light applause, not the riots cheers he received in 2008.  People who gave a monthly donation to his campaign in 2008 have shut the purse so tight that light cannot escape (let alone dollars).  Even Debbie Wasserman-Schultz had to try and convince her own family to support Obama.  (They are debating to support her re-election attempt.)

The tribe is angry and no fake visit to Israel (With a couple of tons of equipment, 2 separate means of travel [One for Barack and another for Michelle.], and costs to the US Taxpayer of millions of dollars wasted.) will convince the tribe that we should support Obama once again.  No this time our eyes are opening and we will not be fooled once more.

The Jewish People will remember everything in November!

Obama And The Israelis

President Barack Hussein Obama is sitting pretty.  He believes he has talked Binyamin Netanyahu out of attacking Iran (Before the election.  Afterwards Obama can do what ever he pleases to Israel.), he is raising money hand over foot (Although he fell very short of his goal of $250 million for this quarter [He raised only $40 million.].), and he was able to steer the public (Main Stream Media in this case.) away from his attacks on the Roman Catholic Church and onto the GOP by utilizing a liar by the name of Sandra Fuck Fluke.  It has been a good week so far.  Except the applause at AIPAC was weak, and Netanyahu did not actually agree to his demands.  But President Obama is assured that on November 6th he will be re-elected.  Unless the Israelis attack Iran before the Summer.

Stopping from obtaining a nuclear weapon is more important than President Barack Obama’s re-election campaign, Washington Post and widely syndicated columnist Charles Krauthammer wrote Sunday.

He also revealed that a senior administration official told the newspaper, "We're trying to make the decision to attack as hard as possible for Israel.”

The veteran journalist accused President Obama of cheering for Israel at last week’s American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) conference and then stepping an about-face by agreeing “to yet another round of talks with the mullahs” of Iran despite previous “blatant Iranian stalling and unseriousness” on the part of the Ahmadinejad regime.

Krauthammer directly accused President Obama of putting his own campaign for re-election ahead of Israel security. “Obama wants to get past Nov. 6 without any untoward action that might threaten his re-election,” he wrote.

Negotiations between the United Nations nuclear watchdog IAEA and Iran so far have taken on the aspect of a charade, with Tehran speeding up its work to enrich uranium, a key ingredient for a nuclear weapon, at the same time it “talks about talking.”

“These negotiations don't just gain time for a nuclear program about whose military intent the IAEA is issuing alarming warnings,” according to Krauthammer. “They make it extremely difficult for Israel to do anything about it (while it still can), lest Israel be universally condemned for having aborted a diplomatic solution.”

As for talks and economic sanctions, he stated, “Holding talks is not success. Imposing sanctions is not success."

President Obama told AIPAC, “Iran's leaders should have no doubt about the resolve of the United States.”

Krauthammer commented, “And then he pursues policies — open-ended negotiations, deceptive promises of tough U.S. backing for Israel, boasts about the efficacy of sanctions, grave warnings about ‘war talk’ — meant, as his own official admitted, to stop Israel from exercising precisely that sovereign right to self-protection…

”A fair-minded observer might judge that Israel's desire to not go gently into the darkness carries higher moral urgency than the political future of one man, even if he is president of the United States.”

Source What President Obama wants is Israel to just go away.  A goal he will try to achieve if he is re-elected.  When Israel attack Iran all hell will break lose.  Iran will go to the Security Council and demand a declaration and sanctions against Israel.  And once again Obama will have to use the VETO.  And like last time our Ambassador to the UN, Susan Rice will tell the despot assembled that the only reason the US used its VETO was so President Obama could garner the Jewish vote.  And that in his second term it will not happen again.

Only this time Ambassador Rice you should remember this:

The Jewish Community Will Remember Everything in November!!

Just To Piss Off Bill Maher

And any other Atheist.

I really don't care if you believe in G-d or not, but when you demand that all references to the All Mighty are to be removed from the Public Arena because they "offend" you, then you have gone too far.  The minority does not have the right to dictate to the majority.  In a republic such as we have the minority has right to believe or not to believe and not be penalized for that belief.  But the majority also has rights.  And if the majority wishes to place a copy of the 10 Commandment, a Nativity Scene, or even a prayer plaque then the minority in this case should just look the other way.  To demand their removal is against the Constitution, and the views of the Founding Fathers.  So in this vein and to piss off Bill Maher who as an Atheist is offended by even the mention of G-d I submit this wonderful song for your enjoyment:

G-d Bless America  Sung by Kate Smith

I do hope you enjoyed it.  I did.

Scientists Prove Brain Eating Amoeba Causes People To Vote Democrat

To E:  This is Satire!

Every wonder why, in the face of all the facts, the destruction of the economy, etc., people vote for Democrats?  Well thanks to Jodi Miller of Newsbusted we now know--brain eating amoebas. Apparently these strange microscopic creatures not only cause people to vote for the nearest progressive Democrat, but it also makes them believe in the global warming hoax.

Deeds

From the Republican Jewish Coalition



During President Obama's speech at the recent AIPAC policy conference, he said of Israel, "But as you examine my commitment, you don't just have to count on my words. You can look at my deeds."

Looking at the President's deeds regarding Israel gives supporters of a strong U.S.-Israel alliance much to be concerned about.

This web ad highlights the fact that those concerns are not just Republican concerns, but have been expressed by top Democratic leaders as well. This ad shows what Democrats are saying, in their own words, about the President's policies on Israel.

The Jewish Community Will Remember In November!!!

Farrakhan at UC Berkeley-What Mark Yudof Must Do

Gary Fouse
fousesquawk
http://garyfouse.blog.com



Hat tip Daily Californian

The Daily Californian, UC Berkeley's campus paper, is running an op-ed by Rabbi Adam Neftalin-Kellman, executive director of Berkeley Hillel on tomorrow's speaking appearance at UC Berkeley by Louis Farrakhan.

http://www.dailycal.org/2012/03/09/farrakhans-presence-demonizes-jews-and-others/

In addition, here is another op-ed by Daily Californian staff writer Jason Willick.

http://www.dailycal.org/2012/03/07/farrakhan-and-uc-berkeleys-free-speech-fallacy/

Another report by CBS San Francisco:

http://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2012/03/09/kcbs-cover-story-farrakhan-uc-berkeley-appearance-stirs-debate-protests/

Let me say this: A petition to bar a speaker is a dangerous thing. Today it is Farrakhan; tomorrow it is Rush Limbaugh; then it is who knows who. (No, I am not comparing Limbaugh to Farrakhan in any way.) I think this should be handled as I have advocated for the notorious UC Irvine events held by the Muslim Student Union every May. When a hateful speaker comes, he or she has the First Amendment right to speak and speak without being disrupted. If they make an inflammatory statement that leads directly to someone being assaulted then they can be held liable. Other than that, there isn't much you can do. Yet, others have the right to be present and peacefully protest. They can hold signs. They can pass out leaflets. Most importantly, they can participate in the question and answer session. If time does not allow, they can ask for the speaker to stick around for some questions and dialogue. If they desire, their question can be a statement though a long diatribe of a speech will be cut off by the moderator.

This is what I would encourage the opponents of Farrakhan to do.

And there is no person at UC Berkeley more appropriate to do that than UC President Mark Yudof, who just yesterday, issued a UC-wide statement condemning racist and anti-Semitic expressions on his campuses. Yudof, who is himself Jewish and whose office is in the Bay area, should be at that event. He should monitor what Farrakhan says and after that, he should stand up and tell Farrakhan in no uncertain terms what he thinks of him. He should also tell the Black Student Union that they should be ashamed of themselves for inviting such an odious character to speak and that they have lost any credibility should they ever want to complain about racism.

No excuses, Mr Yudof. If you are out of town, get back right away. If you have other commitments, cancel them. This is the most important task you have had to date in your tenure. You have taken a lot of heat for the way you have handled -or not handled these problems. You have an extraordinary opportunity tomorrow to start setting the UC ship right and be taken seriously.

Don't blow it.

Peace Now's Megillah

If you know the story of Purim (You can read it here.) this will hit your funny bone with a sledgehammer.  The Tribe, Latma TV brings to the world the Story of Esther but with a very leftist view.  (And we all know the media in Israel leans far left.)

With Obama the Peace Maker, Shimon of Peres, Ahmadinejad, Mordechai and "The Settlers" the whole gang of good guys and bad guys are here.

Happy Purim

Another Day, Another Anti-Semitic Incident

This time in Bushnell, Florida at the Florida National Cemetery.  There are 118,000 graves at the Florida National Cemetery and this weekend some were pushed over.  When the authorities examined the graves each one over turned has a Star of David on it.

BUSHNELL - Detectives in central Florida are investigating a hate crime in Bushnell – the vandalism of Jewish headstones in a veterans' cemetery.

Jewish headstones vandalized in veterans' cemetery: MyFoxTAMPABAY.com

Sumter County Sheriff's Office detectives started their investigation into what happened to the headstones on Monday. Several headstones in two sections of the Florida National Cemetery were found pushed over or dug out last weekend.

The headstones were identified as Jewish by the Stars of David on them.

Lawmakers in Florida chastised the crime upon hearing the news.

"This is a tragic and despicable incident, and whoever is responsible for this should be ashamed of their actions and brought to justice," Florida Rep. Gus Bilirakis said in a statement obtained by FOX 13. "Not only did these vandals desecrate the memorials of those who fought and died to protect our freedom, but they targeted individuals simply because of their religious beliefs."

The Florida National Cemetery is run by the Department of Veterans Affairs.

"We are talking about the final resting place for members of the Armed Forces," Florida Rep. Rich Nugent said in a statement. "To violate the sanctity of such a place is appalling, and if early reports are accurate and that the attacks were indeed motivated by anti-Semitism and a hatred of religious freedom, it is an attack on the very liberties that these soldiers, sailors, airmen, Marines and Coast Guard gave their lives for. It is unacceptable on so many levels. I hope the authorities catch the vandals and that they catch them soon."

Source

Not only are Jews being told that they are not allowed to live in the US, now Jews are being told they are not allowed to be buried in the US.  And Obama is silent on all of this.

How Many Jews Does it Take to Change a Light Bulb?

The Answer to one of the greatest questions known to man.



What if these famous people had Jewish mothers? Frenetic comedy in the spirit of Purim.

Code Pink To Disolve!

It was announced today by Code Pink co-founder Medea Benjamin that the organization Code Pink will be dissolving and giving up their Communist agenda.  Ms Benjamin was informed that when the revolution was over she and the other useful idiots members of Code Pink would be given a long, well deserved rest in a retraining center health spa.  There they will become the perfect members of the new society.

Upon hearing this these ladies in pink of the left tore off their pink garments, donned camouflage fatigues and ran to the nearest recruitment office.  There they will serve their nation.